To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

Although Hjalmar Branting said The confederacy of Nations is not the only organization, albeit the most official, which has grave the maintenance of peace through law on its banner. , the bail of Nations was the most victorious organization in the 1920s. There were one-third major reasons why the partnership was successful in the 1920s. They were victorious, because they colonised disputes oer countries, had more organizations, and last but not least(prenominal) they were successful because of the signing of the Pact of Paris. In the 1920s the conference of Nations managed to settle umteen disagreements between countries, which make the union of Nations a successful organization. Although the League of Nations failed to prevent the annexing of Vilnius by Poland in 1922, or Italy invade Corfu in 1923, they also achieved good things. They solved the problem everyplace the Ã…land Island between Finland and Sweden. After the decision of the League of Nations those 6,50 0 islands remained a part of Finland but were govern by both countries . also the League of Nations settled the argument over Upper Silesia by which Germany and Poland were involved. Both of the countries wanted to have to Upper Silesia and the League of Nations indomitable to divide the land by two. And the last successful elimination in the 1920s was between Greece and Bulgaria in 1925.

The Greek invaded Bulgaria as a reply to the murdering of Greek people. The League interfered and Greece became angry about their decision, reminding them of the exceed between Italy and Greece in 1923, where Italy attacked t hem and Greece had to pay Italy for that and! apologize. Those three incidents in the 1920s do the League a successful organization. An action which showed the success of the League of Nations was the establishment of organizations... If you want to get a full essay, range it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay